February 05, 2005
Why are pets better than kids?
(Category:
Short Stops
)
Posted by Jim | Permalink
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/66081
This site sponsored by a Jew or two.
Powered by Movable Type 2.64 | This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
...but you wouldn't "fix" your kid, would you?
I'm pretty sure ours are already irreparable.
So you have a pregnant pet?
And good luck with the selling if you do.
When I was young I had a cat who had kittens. We walked all over the neighborhood trying to give them away. One woman directed us to another house where she said the woman had many cats and would probably take ours, as she was a cat lover.
The woman in question was not home.
I returned home with my sighs of non-success, but assured my mother that we still might have a taker because "the lady at the cat-house was not home."
My mom had a good laugh. Then she explained a couple of things to me.
LOL.....No Rachel.We don't have a pregnant pet.We are "resposible" pet owners.Our dogs and cats are all (but the Lab doggie)I would hate to put more unessesary puppies or kittens outthere while there are so many waiting to be adopted.
Speaking of it.....our doggie goes in to get fixed this month.Lucky her......she never has to worry again!LOL
Pets housetrain quicker and they are way more loyal than kids as well.
I always recommend that couples have a puppy over a baby. Not that it stopped my own son & spouse from making me into a grandpa...
As for "fixing" a kid- I'm for installing seminal vessicle shut-off valves in boys at 10 years of age and giving them the prepaid certificate to have the valves turned back open for their 24th birthday.
Dang bit tougher on those girls though.
Nate, your son and wife made you a grandpa?
Ummm, isn't that illegal?