In a hostage situation the victims will tend to become appreciative of their captor. He is God-like in his ability to take life away and the hostage is grateful that their life is being spared. The hostage comes to see it, emotionally, as the captor granting them life and is appreciative of this gift. I see this very same mentality in our society today. America has Stockholm Syndrome with our government playing the part of the captor.
It boils down to one statement. This is the truth: The Government Does Not Grant You Rights
How often do you hear or read phrases about rights granted by the Constitution or Bill of Rights? How many times have you heard somebody say that this or that country should grant their citizens certain rights like our government grants us? These sentiments are exactly wrong and directly contrary to the documents and ideals that founded our country. Just as the hostage taker is not granting life by not taking it, neither is our government granting us the rights that it does not remove.
Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence:We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
In simple language this is saying that you are born with the right to do anything and that the purpose of government is to protect your rights. This is a powerful and often forgotten sentiment. Government is not here to grant you rights. You already have them. Government is here to stop other people from taking away your rights.
The core concepts to remember are that you begin with every right, the Constitution protects certain of your rights, and laws restrict or remove your rights. This is a heady concept, and frightening as well for many people. Taken literally this means that a critical component of the job of every Congressman and Senator is to pare away your rights.
This mistaken groupthink is pervasive. In the Presidential debates one of Bush's criticisms of Kerry was the relatively low number of laws he has authored during his tenure as Senator. Kerry disputed this, claiming to have been instrumental in a very large number of bills. I was horrified by this exchange. Both men were making it clear that they considered the removal of my rights to be not only a just goal but the lack of such efforts to be a considerable failing. They were both saying that a good Senator is one who makes a lot of laws.
Wrong. Very, very wrong. A good Senator or Congressman should be a terrible legislator. A good Senator should be primarily concerned with protecting the Constitution, not increasing the bulk of the Code of Law. Anything else is a direct contradiction of their oath of office.
Oath of Office, Congress:I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
Note that there is absolutely nothing in the oath regarding the crafting of laws. The entire focus of the oath that every Senator and Congressman takes is that they will protect the Constitution.
The same thing goes for the President.
Oath of Office, President:I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
The documents are so clear. The sentiments are impossible to misunderstand. Even so, later today George Bush will repeat that oath of office. A short time later in a speech he will completely ignore it as he talks about forming a cooperative coalition of legislators to craft new laws and further snip away at the Constitution he has just sworn to protect.
It is frightening that this Stockholm Syndrome is so widespread that even the President of the United States is a victim of it. It is absolutely terrifying that it is so pervasive that this perfidy is not only accepted but actually lauded by the populace at large.
I'm gonna pick a nit. I believe you're referring to the "Stockholm Syndrome" when you mention becoming appreciative of one's captors.
Nevertheless, your point in this excellent post is well-taken.
That's it! Damn, I was trying to think of that all morning. Thanks, Harv.
Yeah stockholm wrong word, but anyway aside from that good point.
So I missed the speech; did it go as (badly) as you expected it to or were you pleasantly surprised?
I missed it as well. No headphones at work. ;-)
I'll give it a listen in the morning and see how it went.
I rather enjoyed the speech. I think the President is on a good track. He has a HUGE agenda... I wonder how much of it he can force Congress to actually take action on.
I can't say if his ideas are good or bad yet... we won't know for twenty years. It's very interesting -- Bush may go down in history as one of the most influental presidesnts of all time or as an ineffective elader with terrible ideas. Only time will tell.
It wasn't as bad as I feared. He spoke in generalizations and didn't specifically mention the crafting of laws. Then again the topics he spoke about generally will be pursued with legislation so I guess it's really six of one, half a dozen of the other.
What truly amazed me about his speech this time was how WELL spoken he was.He did not stumble and stutter as he usually does.That again proofs to me that Bush is a PERSON,a REAL person with flaws like every other person.Which makes me feel very comfortable to have him as a president.He has big plans and I doubt he can put them all into reality,but in my opinion he tries hard and is very considerate of people opinions.