The other night things got a bit frisky at home and Lovely Wife and I got a bit happy with the old digital camera. Hey, it's a free country, it was the privacy of our own home and the kids were all asleep. While reviewing the resulting incriminating evidence it became apparent that we had a difference of opinion. I thought that they were very beautiful and considered them artistic photos. Lovely Wife thought they were basically porn and that I better not even think of posting them.
Since I'm naturally contrary and I've got a good 8 hours or so before she can physically harm me I've decided to post a select couple of pics. I'm not trying to showcase the Peacock Family nudity here, I'm genuinely interested in whether you think these are artistic or pornographic.
If a female spreads her legs is it automatically porn? View image
If it's tastefully done can a penis be artistic? View image
Let me know what you think.
I didn't even have to look and I knew what was in those pics. (You're getting predictable, Jim!)
The only way I can see this backfiring is that people may be afraid to open them for fear that they are not work safe.
Also - it appears that you've played the p0rnolanche game again too! Heck you might be up to 200,000 hits by March 2nd...
Nah - I was careful this time. It's all inferred stuff avoiding the naughty key words so should avoid a pornolanche.
Porn
Best laugh I've had all day !
My God, my eyes! My eyes!
Put a XXX warning on those next time, will ya'? Some of us have delicate sensitivities!
Geez. Bordering on the perverse.
Definitely porn.
Glad there are some that agree with me.;-)
PORN!!
Y'all just have no artistic sense.
Oh, the exquisite lighting, the subtle tonalities, the delicate juxtaposition of....
Who am I kidding?
Puppy Porn!
Well, I'm sorry to say that while I wouldn't call them porn, I think those photos are looonnngggggg way away from "beautiful and artistic".
But they are pretty funny . . .