Snooze Button Dreams
Snooze Button Dreams
Snooze Button Dreams
September 09, 2003
Amnesty National
(Category: News & Notes )

So, the RIAA is offering an "amnesty" (note the scare quotes) to people who are currently sharing copyrighted materials. No, I'm not linking to it because if I did there's a chance one of my loyal readers might actually go and apply for it. That would be a bad thing. You see, it's a negative sum game. The amnesty is not available for people who are currently being sued and all you really have to do to avoid being sued is stop sharing (which you must do anyway to qualify for the amnesty). The EFF has some other recommendations on how not to get sued.

Applying for this RIAA amnesty will only identify you as a copyright violator, there is no guarantee that the RIAA will keep that fact to themselves and the RIAA is not the only group out there pursuing action against copyright infringers. If you were one of these other groups, wouldn't you pay some cashola for a list of confirmed and admitted copyright violators?

Some folk are a bit vocal (and humorous) about how you would be screwed by applying for the amnesty.

I don't share or download tunes. Not that I'd feel particularly bad about it, music just isn't that big for me. I used to be way into music and I have a massive CD collection but I haven't added to it in about 10 years. I got pissed because it would cost close to $20 to get the one song I wanted, along with 19 crapful songs, so I just stopped buying new. I then got into the BMG thing where you get 12 for 1 and did that for a couple years, cancelling my membership each time I met my obligation and then joining again for the big special when i wanted some CDs. That got old as their selections never really changed and I pretty much had everything they offered. I started buying used but that didn't last long either as the CDs I wanted to purchase generally weren't there. Eventually I just stopped buying music, period.

Over a couple years my music fetish atrophied and died. By the time file sharing came out I was just over it. I played with Napster a bit but even that was more effort than I was willing to put into what was once my favorite hobby. Too many downloads aborted, too many bad files. As far as the whole file sharing shebang goes, Randy Nieland sums it up nicely:

I'm not all that concerned about file sharing from a conceptual standpoint because I do think there are painfully obvious copyright issues in play. However, the RIAA is seriously losing all hope of winning and keeping the favor of the very market they are attempting to retain as music purchasers. The appeal of P2P networks isn't tough to see when faced with the cost of music, even after the promised price cuts. Apple just sold the 10 millionth song through the iTunes Store, and look at the overall consumer market share that Apple has. Others, such as Microsoft and the infamous BuyMusic.com are jumping on Apple's bandwagon now that the concept has been proven a sound one. Make it easy, make it affordable and make it convenient. Everything that the rack of CDs at WalMart is running away from at a dead sprint.
(Link credit to Randy and G)
Posted by Jim | Permalink
Comments
Posted by: timberland sale at September 15, 2009 07:05 AM

free Computers directory What happens when your other devices try to connect wirelessly? fashion blog uk A hub does absolutely nothing except act as a repeater

Posted by: Dmoz O at June 7, 2010 09:29 PM
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/3644

This site sponsored by a Jew or two.

Powered by Movable Type 2.64 | This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License. | Creative Commons License